By default, Bugzilla does not search the list of RESOLVED bugs.
You can force it to do so by putting the upper-case word ALL in front of your search query, e.g.: ALL tdelibs
We recommend searching for bugs this way, as you may discover that your bug has already been resolved and fixed in a later release.

Bug 1003

Summary:	screen lock fails when computer is suspended
Product:	TDE	Reporter:	Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf>
Component:	tdebase	Assignee:	Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	critical	CC:	bugwatch, darrella, slavek.banko, tiagomnm
Priority:	P5
Version:	R14.0.0 [Trinity]
Hardware:	Other
OS:	Linux
Compiler Version:		TDE Version String:
Application Version:		Application Name:

Description Timothy Pearson 2012-05-18 02:30:47 CDT

When suspending a computer from the shutdown dialog, the screen is not locked, and all attempts to lock the resumed computer fail.

Comment 1 Timothy Pearson 2012-05-20 18:22:56 CDT

Fixed in GIT hash 193d9af.

Comment 2 Slávek Banko 2012-05-20 18:36:34 CDT

I see correctly that the patch changes the ABI?

Comment 3 Timothy Pearson 2012-05-20 18:38:39 CDT

(In reply to comment #2)
> I see correctly that the patch changes the ABI?

The ABI for kshutdowndialog, yes.  That being said, I don't expect this change to cause problems, as kshutdowndialog is only used by ksmserver.

Tim

Comment 4 Slávek Banko 2012-05-20 18:42:21 CDT

(Odpověď na komentář #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I see correctly that the patch changes the ABI?
> 
> The ABI for kshutdowndialog, yes.  That being said, I don't expect this change
> to cause problems, as kshutdowndialog is only used by ksmserver.
> 
> Tim

I am interested to know how safe it is to take the patch into 3.5.13.1.
It does not affect the calls using DCOP?

Comment 5 Timothy Pearson 2012-05-20 20:38:31 CDT

(In reply to comment #4)
> (Odpověď na komentář #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > I see correctly that the patch changes the ABI?
> > 
> > The ABI for kshutdowndialog, yes.  That being said, I don't expect this change
> > to cause problems, as kshutdowndialog is only used by ksmserver.
> > 
> > Tim
> 
> I am interested to know how safe it is to take the patch into 3.5.13.1.
> It does not affect the calls using DCOP?

In theory it *should* be safe.  In practice, failures can occur even if ABI compatibility guidelines were followed perfectly.

Try it and see if anything crashes! :-)  The only potential crash candidate I can think of *might* be kpowersave.

Tim

Comment 6 Slávek Banko 2012-05-24 14:20:58 CDT

(Odpověď na komentář #5)
> In theory it *should* be safe.  In practice, failures can occur even if ABI
> compatibility guidelines were followed perfectly.
> 
> Try it and see if anything crashes! :-)  The only potential crash candidate I
> can think of *might* be kpowersave.
> 
> Tim

I integrate commit 193d9afc into 3.5.13.1 and it looks good. Nothing crashes. kpowersave also works well. Well done - thank you.

Comment 7 Timothy Pearson 2012-05-25 21:01:22 CDT

*** Bug 686 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***