| Summary: | Build issue: videodev.h is renamed in newer versions of video4linux | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | TDE | Reporter: | Darrell <darrella> |
| Component: | tdeedu | Assignee: | Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | critical | CC: | bugwatch, darrella, kb9vqf |
| Priority: | P5 | ||
| Version: | R14.0.0 [Trinity] | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Compiler Version: | TDE Version String: | ||
| Application Version: | Application Name: | ||
|
Description
Darrell
2012-12-23 18:30:20 CST
The configure warnings: checking for struct v4l2_buffer... no checking for /lib/modules/3.2.29/build/include/linux/videodev2.h... yes configure: WARNING: configure: WARNING: configure: WARNING: We cannot locate videodev2.h in /usr/include/linux configure: WARNING: configure: WARNING: This file is responsible for V4L2 in KStars configure: WARNING: This file is correct in /lib/modules/3.2.29/build/include configure: WARNING: It is recommended that you copy this file and videodev.h to /usr/include/linux configure: WARNING: Successful configure checks: checking for struct v4l2_buffer... yes This should be fixed in GIT hash ab9a2a8 (tdeedu). The real problem was that videodev2.h was not being detected when the older videodev.h file was not present on the system. Please test and close this bug if the fix works for you. Thanks for reporting! The tdeedu package built with the patch. I don't see the same configure WARNINGs, but how do I know the package built correcty? I don't see any related messages in the configuration output. Also I did not receive an email after your post. Is the email server working correctly? Never mind on the mail server. Problem was at my end. (In reply to comment #3) > The tdeedu package built with the patch. I don't see the same configure > WARNINGs, but how do I know the package built correcty? I don't see any related > messages in the configuration output. Look for a line referencing v4l2_buffer in the configure output; as long as that line says "yes" then the patch worked. Tim checking for struct v4l2_buffer... yes Tagging as resolved. Thanks! |