| Summary: | Amarok conflicts with official version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | TDE | Reporter: | b.r.longbons |
| Component: | tdemultimedia | Assignee: | Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | bugwatch, darrella |
| Priority: | P5 | ||
| Version: | 3.5.10 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Compiler Version: | TDE Version String: | ||
| Application Version: | Application Name: | ||
|
Description
b.r.longbons
2009-03-09 19:20:31 CDT
Never mind, it looks like the 2009-03-08 update must have fixed it; I can't reproduce it anymore. But shouldn't it have conflicted (as in, marked so in the deb) before that? The objective is to allow KDE3.5 to coexist with any and all official packages, so: a.) amarok-kde3 should not dpkg-conflict with amarok b.) If a file is installed in the same location as the official version, then it is moved to a different location in /opt/kde3. That is what was fixed in the update. Although the situation has resolved itself, there remains confusion. I clarify here. I found the update list and there was both a 03-04 and the 03-08 version. I checked the version in my cache and indeed, the 03-04 version included the file /etc/kde3/amarokrc, despite having moved everything else to /opt. The word "conflicts" in the original title was intended to mean "it does conflict" not "it should be marked as conflicting." The word "should" in Comment #1 was intended to mean "expected to" not "desired to," when I assumed that the previous version of amarok-common was still in /usr. |